Comparison

Miro vs Foveate

Miro is where a team thinks out loud together: sticky notes, diagrams, and a shared canvas for working through an idea before it's finished. Foveate is what a client opens once that idea is ready to present. An honest comparison of where each belongs.

One is built for the conversation before the pursuit is real. The other is built for the room where it gets decided.

See the Comparison
A team working through ideas together

What is Miro?

Miro is a collaborative online whiteboard built for teams to brainstorm, diagram, and work through ideas together in real time. Sticky notes, freeform diagrams, workshop and retrospective templates, and an infinite canvas make it a strong tool for internal ideation and planning.

What is Foveate?

A live Foveate proposal, not a work in progress.

Foveate is where the finished idea gets presented to the client and tracked. A pursuit is built from the firm's own library of renders, 3D models, drawings, and team resumes, delivered as one browser link, and reported on after it's sent.

Miro vs Foveate

Where each tool sits in the work of winning a project.

Capability

Miro

Foveate
Built for
A shared canvas for a team to think through an idea together, before it's finished.
Presenting a finished pursuit to a client and tracking what they did with it.
Audience
Internal: your own team, in a workshop or planning session.
External: the client and the committee deciding the project.
Content
Sticky notes, rough diagrams, freeform sketches, works in progress.
Finished renderings, navigable 3D, video, fee, schedule, and narrative.
Structure
An infinite canvas with no fixed order. Built for exploring, not for reading in sequence.
A structured pursuit with a clear narrative order, built to be read start to finish or jumped into by section.
What happens after you share it
A link to the board. Anyone with access can keep editing it.
A read-only, trackable link. Per-viewer identity, section-level dwell time, and notification on open.
Client-readiness
Not designed to be client-facing. Boards look like works in progress because that's what they are.
Built specifically to be the thing a client opens, on any device.

What Miro is for

  • ✓Running a workshop, retrospective, or brainstorm with your own team.
  • ✓Mapping out a design process or a stakeholder network before it's finalized.
  • ✓Early-stage planning where the shape of the idea is still changing.
  • ✓Internal alignment before anyone outside the firm sees anything.

What Foveate is for

  • ✓The idea is finished and ready to go in front of a client or a committee.
  • ✓You want to know who opened it, what they looked at, and for how long.
  • ✓The proposal depends on visual storytelling: renderings, 3D models, precedent projects.
  • ✓The deliverable needs to look like a finished presentation, not a work in progress.

A whiteboard for thinking. A presentation for deciding.

Miro is genuinely useful for the part of the process a client never sees: working through a design approach, mapping stakeholders, planning a pursuit strategy as a team. Foveate picks up once that thinking is done and it's time to show the client something finished. Most firms that use Miro well keep using it for exactly that, and bring the finished result into Foveate when it's ready to be seen.

See how Foveate presentations work

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Foveate a replacement for Miro?
No, and it isn't trying to be. Miro is built for the internal, in-progress thinking: brainstorming, stakeholder mapping, workshop facilitation. Foveate is built for the external, finished result: the presentation a client actually opens. Most firms use both, at different stages of the same pursuit.
Can I bring a Miro board into a Foveate presentation?
Not directly as a live board, and that's deliberate. A Foveate presentation is meant to look finished, not like a work in progress. Firms typically take the outcome of a Miro session, a settled diagram, a stakeholder map, a design direction, and rebuild it as a polished visual inside the proposal.
Does Foveate have a whiteboard or brainstorming mode?
Foveate's Board view lets you zoom out and see every slide in a pursuit at once, which is useful for reorganizing a presentation, but it isn't a general-purpose whiteboard. It's built around the finished content of a proposal, not open-ended brainstorming.
Which one should a small firm use?
Both, if the budget allows, since they solve different problems. A firm that has to pick one should ask which stage is currently the bigger bottleneck: figuring out what to say to the client, or making sure what gets said actually lands and gets tracked.

Better clients. Higher fees. No silence after the send.

Start free with 200 credits. Pro is $39 per person a month, billed annually. Or bring a pursuit you're running now and we'll walk it through with you.

Start for free